A relação médico-família diante da terminalidade em UTI / The doctor-family relation when facing terminality in ICU

A comunicação entre paciente, família e equipe médica no contexto da terminalidade torna-se complexa em função da multiplicidade de fatores envolvidos. Neste artigo, objetivamos investigar a visão do médico intensivista acerca da participação da família em situação de terminalidade em UTI e da comunicação de más notícias. Realizou-se uma pesquisa qualitativa, na qual foram entrevistados seis membros da equipe médica intensivista de um hospital privado de médio porte. Da análise do conteúdo das entrevistas emergiram seis categorias: percepção sobre o paciente em situação de terminalidade; emoções frente à morte e ao morrer; conflitos éticos; família diante da terminalidade; comunicando más notícias e relação médico-família no processo de tomada de decisões. Neste trabalho, são apresentadas as três últimas categorias. Os resultados mostraram que o processo de comunicação é valorizado, com ênfase na comunicação empática, afetiva e efetiva. Quanto ao processo de tomada de decisão, ora o modelo compartilhado é utilizado, ora o modelo paternalista, dependendo da compreensão da família acerca da terminalidade. Apesar do reconhecimento da importância da família, esta é vista como presença incômoda, pois indaga e questiona. O trabalho interdisciplinar e colaborativo entre os membros da equipe de saúde tem destaque...

Communication between patients, families and medical staff in the context of terminality becomes complex due to the multiplicity of factors involved. In this paper we seek to investigate the intensivist doctor’s point of view regarding the participation of the family in a terminal situation in ICU and the communication of bad news. We performed a qualitative research in which we interviewed six members of the intensivist medical staff of a medium-sized private hospital. Six categories emerged from the content analysis of the interviews: perception of the patient in terminal condition; emotions towards death and dying; ethical conflicts; family facing terminality; communicating bad news; and the doctor-family relation in the decision-making process. In this study we will present the last three categories. The results showed that the communication process is valued, with emphasis on an empathic, affective and effective communication. Concerning the decision-making process, at times the shared model is used, at others the paternalist model, depending upon the family’s understanding of terminality. Despite the acknowledgement of the importance of the family, the latter is seen as an uncomfortable presence since it pries and questions. Special attention is given to interdisciplinary and collaborative work between healthcare staff members...

Critical Care In Korea: Present and Future

Critical (or intensive) care medicine (CCM) is a branch of medicine concerned with the care of patients with potentially reversible life-threatening conditions. Numerous studies have demonstrated that adequate staffing is of crucial importance for patient outcome. Adequate staffing also showed favorable cost-effectiveness in terms of ICU stay, decreased use of resources, and lower re-admission rates. The current status of CCM of our contry is not comparable to that of advanced countries. The global pandemic episodes in the past decade showed that our society is not well prepared for severe illnesses or mass casualty. To improve CCM in Korea, reimbursement of the government must be amended such that referral hospitals can hire sufficient number of qualified intensivists and nurses. For the government to address these urgent issues, public awareness of the role of CCM is also required.

Intensivist Physician Staffing in Intensive Care Units / 대한구급학회지

Despite a shortage of intensivists, there is an increased need for intensivist staffing in intensive care units (ICUs). Western studies showed that the survival rate of critically ill patients improved and the length of ICU stay decreased in "closed" or "high-intensity" ICU, where intensivists dedicated themselves to the ICU and were primary physicians. This system was also associated with an increased compliance of evidence-based medicine and a decreased medical error. The Leapfrog Group and American College of Critical Care Medicine recommend the implementation of intensivist staffing system in the ICU. Although there are still barriers to implement this system, such as the economic burden to hospitals and conflicts among medical staff, intensivist staffing in the ICU is important in terms of timely diagnosis and treatment and multidisciplinary team approach. The presence of intensivists may also increase the efficacy of ICU systems and save treatment cost. Although the "24 hours/7 days intensivist staffing" system may be ideal, recent data showed that high-intensity ICU system during daytime is not inferior to 24-hour intensivist staffing system in terms of hospital mortality. It is especially important to large-scale academic hospitals, where many severely ill patients are treated. However, few ICUs have intensivists who are committed to caring for ICU patients in Korea. Therefore, we have to try to expand this system throughout the whole country. Additionally, the definition of ICU standard, the role of intensivists, and the policy of financial reward also need to be clarified more clearly.

Structure of Intensive Care Unit and Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza A/H1N1 2009 / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: During 2009 pandemic period, many Koreans were infected and admitted with Influenza A/H1N1. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether the structures of an intensive care unit (ICU) were associated with the outcomes of critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined critically ill adult patients with influenza A/H1N1, who were admitted to 24 hospitals in Korea, from September 2009 to February 2010. We collected data of ICU structure, patients and 90 days mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, with backward elimination, were performed to determine the most significant risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 239 patients, mortality of 90 days was 43%. Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score (p < 0.001), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (p < 0.0001), nurse to beds ratio (p = 0.039) and presence of intensivist (p = 0.024) were significant risk factors of 90 days mortality. Age (p = 0.123), gender (p = 0.304), hospital size (p = 0.260), and ICU type (p = 0.409) were insignificantly associated with mortality. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients with less than 6 SOFA score had significantly lower mortality, compared with those with more than 10 SOFA score (odds ratio 0.156, p < 0.0001). The presence of intensivist had significantly lower mortality, compared with the absence (odds ratio 0.496, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In critically ill patients with influenza A/H1N1, the severity of the illness and presence of intensivist might be associated with 90 days mortality.

Critical Care Medicine in Korea: Problems and a Solution

The goal of critical care support is to prevent premature death and to reduce the morbidity and suffering of the critically ill patients by intensive therapy for reversible illness within optimal timeframe. Undesirable quality of critical care service in Korean hospitals necessitates system-level change in the organization of critical care. The causes of critical care system failure are multifactorial, including unreasonable critical care reimbursement system, shortage of critical care professionals, and unacceptable level of legal standard for the critical care delivery system. The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine (KSCCM), which was established in 1980, has been trying to improve critical care delivery system. The Society believes that improving ICU care can be achieved by standardizing the critical care initiated by dedicated full-time critical care physicians. To achieve this goal, the Society has attempted to include the critical care specialty as a part of our medical society during the past five years. On April 15th, 2008, the Society established a critical care specialty under the endorsement of the Korean Academy of Medical Societies. The Society believes that implementation of the critical care specialty and the core critical care education and training system can significantly enhance the quality of critical care and patient outcomes in Korean medical institutions. In order to create the high-quality critical care through the successful critical care team approach, we should reform the present critical care delivery system, and re-prioritize medical resources together with relevant legal support. For this, a long-term task force team consisting of all involved stakeholders including policy makers should be operated. The task force team has to play a central authority to implement and regulate the enhanced critical care system effectively to Korean hospitals. The reformation of critical care system should not be delayed, since intensive care unit is the last resort for the critically ill patients.

The Subspecialty Certification for Critical Care Medicine in Korea / 대한구급학회지

The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine (KSCCM) has introduced the Subspecialty System for Critical Care Medicine in Korea under the auspices of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS) in March 2008. Nine medical societies that included the Korean Association of Internal Medicine, the Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, the Korean Society of Anesthesiology, the Korean Neurological Association, the Korean Neurosurgical Society, the Korean Surgical Society, the Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, the Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and the Korean Pediatric Society participated to the new critical care subspecialty. The Board of Critical Care should be certified again every 5 year after achieving the required qualification by the KSCCM. This paper summarizes the Subspecialty Certification System for Critical Care Medicine in Korea.

Discharge Decision-Making by Intensivists on Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit

Patients readmitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) have a significantly higher mortality rate. The role of intensivists in judging when to discharge patients from the ICU is very important. We undertook this study to evaluate the effect of the intensivists' discharge decision-making on readmission to ICU. The intensivists actively participated in the discharge decision-making, with the discharge guideline taken into consideration, in respect of group 1 patients, but not in respect of group 2. The readmission rate in group 1 was lower than that in group 2. The readmission in patients in each group was associated with higher mortality rates and longer lengths of stay at the ICU. Respiratory failure was the major cause of readmission. In the non-survivors out of the readmitted patients, the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores on the initial discharge and readmission, the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) scores on the initial admission, discharge and readmission were higher than the corresponding indices in the survivors. We conclude that the readmission rate was lower when intensivists participated in the discharge decision-making, and that APACHE III and MODS scores on the first discharge and readmission were significant prognostic factors in respect of the readmitted patients.

The Effect of Discharge Decision-Making of the Intensivist on Readmission to the Intensive Care Unit / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Patients readmitted to intensive care unit (ICU) have significantly higher mortality. The role of intensivists to judge when to discharge from ICU may be important. We performed this study to assess the effect of intensivist's discharge decision-making on readmission to ICU. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from patients admitted to ICUs (group 1). Another data were collected retrospectively from the patients' record (group 2). Discharge of the patients in group 1 were based on intensivist's discharge decision-making but not in group 2. We encouraged deep breathing and expectoration to patients of group 1 at risk of pulmonary complication during ICU stay and used a guideline for making discharge decisions. Readmission cause, length of ICU stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) score of readmitted patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Readmission rate of group 1 was lower than that of group 2 (p<0.05). The mortality of readmitted patients in each group was higher than that of non-readmitted patients (p<0.05). Respiratory disease was the major cause of readmission. In non-survivors of readmitted patients, APACHE III score on initial discharge and readmission, MODS score on initial admission, discharge and readmission were higher than those of survivors (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rate was lower when intensivists participated in discharge decision- making. ICU readmission was associated with higher hospital mortality and longer ICU stay. MODS and APACHE III score at first discharge and readmission were significant prognostic factors of the outcome in readmitted patients.

Clinical Features and Risk Factors of Patients Readmitted to ICU / 대한마취과학회지

BACKGROUND: Premature discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) results in ICU readmission and poor outcome. Understanding the clinical features of the readmitted patients may be helpful for intensivists to improve ICU care. We performed this study to determine the causes, outcomes, and risk factors of patients readmitted to the ICU. METHODS: Data was collected from the patients admitted to medical and surgical ICUs of Severance Hospital between January, 1999 and July, 2001 retrospectively. Readmission cause, source, indication, length of ICU stay, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, and multiple-organ failure (MOF) score of readmitted patients were evaluated. Non-survivors and survivors after ICU readmission were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-seven readmitted and 2,412 non-readmitted patients were examined and the readmission rate was 6.3%. Respiratory disease was the major cause of readmission. Readmitted patients had longer initial ICU lengths of stay than non-readmitted patients (13.6 vs 9.4 days, p<0.05). The ICU mortality rate was not significantly higher in the readmitted patients compared with the non-readmitted patients. The MOF score on readmission (5.4 vs 3.1) and APACHE III score on initial discharge (40.7 vs 30.4) and readmission (76.3 vs 44.4), in non-survivors were higher than survivors of the readmitted patients, respectively (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ICU readmission was associated with longer ICU stay and respiratory disease was the major cause of readmission. The MOF score at readmission and APACHE III score at discharge and readmission were significant risk factors of the outcome in readmitted patients.

The Distribution of Medical Personnel and Medical Equipments in the Intensive Care Units in Korea / 대한구급학회지

BACKGROUND: Not much of the fund is invested in the intensive care unit (ICU) in Korean hospitals since the cost of ICU care is set too low compared to the other medical fields as well as to the other part of the world. This study is designed to support the base of an ICU standard guideline in Korea. METHODS: The questionnaire were sent to 73 ICUs and 24 neonatal ICUs (NICU) of 30 hospitals. Twenty-two of them were teaching hospitals and 8 of them were general hospitals. RESULTS: The ratios of ICU bed number to total bed number were 5.0% and 6.0% in teaching hospital and general hospital respectively. The ratios of NICU bed to total bed were 3.4% and 2.0% in teaching hospital and general hospital respectively. Intensivists were kept in 24.6% of ICU and 36.4% of NICU. Residents were kept in 43.1% of ICU and 45.5% of NICU. The utilization of ICU service was 90% for teaching hospital and 86% for general hospital. The utilization of NICU was 89% for teaching hospital and 3% of general hospital. Nurse to patient ratios varied widely. Most ICUs in teaching hospital showed the nurse to patients ratio of 1 : 4 which was about 32% of total ICU. Most NICUs in teaching hospital showed the nurse to patients ratio of 1 : 5 which was around 20% of total NICU. Most of the ICUs were equipped with central piping system for oxygen and compressed air supply, vacuum system and all the necessary medical gadgets such as mechanical ventilators, ECG monitors, defibrillators, pulse oximeters and infusion pumps. CONCLUSIONS: The distribution of medical personnel as well as medical equipments were varied widely. The variation existed between teaching hospital and general hospital as well as within the teaching hospitals. We need to establish a standard, which grades the level of ICU according to the number of keeping physician, nurse-patients ratio, and the types of medical equipments they have.